<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More About Dual Agency In Texas aka Intermediary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rerockstar.com/2010/buyers/dual-agency-texas-aka-intermediary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rerockstar.com/2010/buyers/dual-agency-texas-aka-intermediary/</link>
	<description>&#34;Your all access pass to San Antonio real estate.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rerockstar</title>
		<link>http://www.rerockstar.com/2010/buyers/dual-agency-texas-aka-intermediary/comment-page-1/#comment-3543</link>
		<dc:creator>rerockstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerockstar.com/?p=1901#comment-3543</guid>
		<description>Jim - Texas law requires that all parties be notified that it is an intermediary situation in writing.  You do not have to participate in dual agency and that is your choice.

I don&#039;t dislike inter-office intermediary, as long as everyone gets their disclosures.  I think it&#039;s the only form of dual agency that can be done properly.  For this reason I don&#039;t tell agents in my office about my listings other that what is common publicly available knowledge.  It keeps the door open that one of those agents can represent a buyer without any knowledge of my seller&#039;s position or confidential information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim &#8211; Texas law requires that all parties be notified that it is an intermediary situation in writing.  You do not have to participate in dual agency and that is your choice.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t dislike inter-office intermediary, as long as everyone gets their disclosures.  I think it&#8217;s the only form of dual agency that can be done properly.  For this reason I don&#8217;t tell agents in my office about my listings other that what is common publicly available knowledge.  It keeps the door open that one of those agents can represent a buyer without any knowledge of my seller&#8217;s position or confidential information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Volstad</title>
		<link>http://www.rerockstar.com/2010/buyers/dual-agency-texas-aka-intermediary/comment-page-1/#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Volstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerockstar.com/?p=1901#comment-3538</guid>
		<description>I just discovered that a property in Fair Oaks Ranch is being listed by an agency that my buyers agent works for.  Not a.good thing as I now have to be very careful what I tell this agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just discovered that a property in Fair Oaks Ranch is being listed by an agency that my buyers agent works for.  Not a.good thing as I now have to be very careful what I tell this agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rerockstar</title>
		<link>http://www.rerockstar.com/2010/buyers/dual-agency-texas-aka-intermediary/comment-page-1/#comment-2299</link>
		<dc:creator>rerockstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerockstar.com/?p=1901#comment-2299</guid>
		<description>Richard - Buyer agency didn&#039;t even exist in Texas until the late 80s.  I think dual agency (intermediary) needs to be stuck down.

Mathieu - A buyer can purchase property without an agent (and a seller can sell without it as well).  Engaging directly with the agent though can be a bad decision as they represent the seller - and therefore anything you say to them is not covered by confidentiality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard &#8211; Buyer agency didn&#8217;t even exist in Texas until the late 80s.  I think dual agency (intermediary) needs to be stuck down.</p>
<p>Mathieu &#8211; A buyer can purchase property without an agent (and a seller can sell without it as well).  Engaging directly with the agent though can be a bad decision as they represent the seller &#8211; and therefore anything you say to them is not covered by confidentiality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathieu</title>
		<link>http://www.rerockstar.com/2010/buyers/dual-agency-texas-aka-intermediary/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerockstar.com/?p=1901#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>Us appears to have a rather complex system in respect of the property market. Some aspect I understand and if time is of essence a broker is a great option. However, I personally like to seek properties and engage directly with agent. Is this permitted in the USA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Us appears to have a rather complex system in respect of the property market. Some aspect I understand and if time is of essence a broker is a great option. However, I personally like to seek properties and engage directly with agent. Is this permitted in the USA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Dillon</title>
		<link>http://www.rerockstar.com/2010/buyers/dual-agency-texas-aka-intermediary/comment-page-1/#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Dillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 02:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerockstar.com/?p=1901#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>Dual agency is common in many countries. Australia has one representative for both buyer and seller. This is supported with a very strict legislation and methods of practice. I have often believed that single agents would be a great option and it is pleasing to observe that this is beginning to occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dual agency is common in many countries. Australia has one representative for both buyer and seller. This is supported with a very strict legislation and methods of practice. I have often believed that single agents would be a great option and it is pleasing to observe that this is beginning to occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3 reasons you shouldn&#8217;t call the listing agent — ATX Real Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rerockstar.com/2010/buyers/dual-agency-texas-aka-intermediary/comment-page-1/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>3 reasons you shouldn&#8217;t call the listing agent — ATX Real Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rerockstar.com/?p=1901#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>[...] agency,&#8221; and it&#8217;s all kinds of illegal in Texas.  For more information on agency, here&#8217;s a great article by a REALTOR in San [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] agency,&#8221; and it&#8217;s all kinds of illegal in Texas.  For more information on agency, here&#8217;s a great article by a REALTOR in San [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 467/473 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.rerockstar.com @ 2012-02-08 07:26:24 -->
